On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:13 PM Emily Shaffer <emilyshaffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Of course, taking a completed project - like your initial reftable > submission - and then chopping it up into a cute story of commits is a > pain in the ***. Doing it twice - or more - is just aggravating. So I > wonder whether we can bikeshed what story would look nice before you > even pick up your 'git rebase -i'? Doing that bikeshedding here on list > means that we also have a chance for someone to interrupt and say, "no, > that organization doesn't make sense" - or even for someone to say It would be great if you could bikeshed about this while I'm on holiday :) That said, I think it's worthwhile to first look at the commit that uses the library to implement a ref backend, because that will show better how the reftable library fits with the way that Git likes to consume its data. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - Google Munich I work 80%. Don't expect answers from me on Fridays. -- Google Germany GmbH, Erika-Mann-Strasse 33, 80636 Munich Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
