"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > > The completion tests used that name unnecessarily, and it is a > non-inclusive term, so let's avoid using it here. > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> > --- > t/t9902-completion.sh | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Here, the tests and the tested feature do not work any differently on the first-made branch, so the same "just use topic, not the first-made branch name" used in 3/5 applies here. Luckily, unlike 3/5 and 4/5, this step does not involve names derived from the name of the first-made branch name, so 'main' may be OK as-is, but for consistency across the patches, we may want to consider using 'topic' here as well. I dunno.
