Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > > I'm on the fence on whether this matters. It's a temporary >> > > inconsistency, assuming we eventually move to "main" as the default. >> > > We _could_ push this change off to that patch, too, but it does make >> > > it more noisy. >> > ... > However, in this instance, I think it makes more sense to use a separate > name altogether. I settled for using `topic` instead of `main2`, and > `new-topic` instead of `main3` locally. I think that is sensible. Configuration does not have to be used as an escape hatch to make 'main2' less awkward---if we can avoid 'main2' (or 'master2'), that would be sufficient.
