Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I'm on the fence on whether this matters. It's a temporary > inconsistency, assuming we eventually move to "main" as the default. We > _could_ push this change off to that patch, too, but it does make it > more noisy. Another way to handle this is perhaps to teach test-lib.sh a way to tell it that we want to live in the world where the initial default branch name is 'main' and use that at the beginning of these select test scripts like t3200. Then we can do three related things in a single patch to t3200, which are: - Declare that any "git init" in this test (including the initial one) uses 'main' as the default branch name; - rename 'master' used in the test to 'main' - rename 'master2' used in the test to 'main2' and it would eliminate the awkwardness. The change to test-lib.sh would likely to use init.defaultBranch which also would be a good thing.
