Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, it sounds from the other part of the thread like we'll need > better parse-options support anyway, so this "noop flag bit" idea > probably isn't a good direction anyway. OK. Thanks.
Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > That said, it sounds from the other part of the thread like we'll need > better parse-options support anyway, so this "noop flag bit" idea > probably isn't a good direction anyway. OK. Thanks.