On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:11 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yeah, it looks obviously correct. I am puzzled why "make coccicheck" > doesn't find this, though. +cc René, as my favorite target for > coccinelle nerd-snipes. :) > I added this to contrib/coccinelle/object_id.cocci in v2.27.0 @@ identifier f != oideq; expression E1, E2; @@ - !oidcmp(E1, E2) + oideq(E1, E2) And it found it: $ cat contrib/coccinelle/object_id.cocci.patch diff -u -p a/blame.c b/blame.c --- a/blame.c +++ b/blame.c @@ -1352,8 +1352,7 @@ static struct blame_origin *find_origin( else { int compute_diff = 1; if (origin->commit->parents && - !oidcmp(&parent->object.oid, - &origin->commit->parents->item->object.oid)) + oideq(&parent->object.oid, &origin->commit->parents->item->object.oid)) compute_diff = maybe_changed_path(r, origin, bd); if (compute_diff) Do I need to add more things into the coccinelle definition so that it is more restrictive in terms of the expression we are hunting down?