Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] More commit-graph/Bloom filter improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Question: Should these be GIT_BLOOM_SETTINGS_* instead of GIT_TEST_...?
> I ask because this _could_ be a way to allow user customization,
> without making it as public as a config option. Or, should I just do
> the work and add config settings in this series?

Other than when testing and/or debugging, what are the expected
reasons and situations an individual would want to use customized
settings?  Once a decision is made to use one customized setting for
a repository, does it make sense for a setting other than that one
setting for the same repository, or is it something very handy if we
can use different settings on a whim?  

My gut feeling is that it should be added as per-repo configuration
but only after a use case is found, and GIT_TEST_* would be the way
to go.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux