On 19/06/20 11:20, Michal Suchánek wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:38:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>>> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Git does not have slave branches and has never had. Independent >>>> of any future change to the naming of branches, remove the sole >>>> appearance of the term. >>> >>> I think this is a sensible change, though note that something simpler >>> was proposed recently: >>> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200610165441.iktvzuwz44sbytfg@chatter.i7.local/ >>> >>> and the review suggested using a name that is even more meaningful to >>> the test case (so we not just remove the unwanted names, but make the >>> test easier to follow). >> >> Thanks for spotting that both versions share the same issue. We'd >> just need a single one that is fixed up ;-). > How about s/slave/feature/ > > This is about simulating some development happening on the new branch so > this name looks appropriate. Indeed I was going to send v2 with topic or feature. Thanks, Paolo
