Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 06:38:43PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Git does not have slave branches and has never had. Independent >> of any future change to the naming of branches, remove the sole >> appearance of the term. > > I think this is a sensible change, though note that something simpler > was proposed recently: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200610165441.iktvzuwz44sbytfg@chatter.i7.local/ > > and the review suggested using a name that is even more meaningful to > the test case (so we not just remove the unwanted names, but make the > test easier to follow). Thanks for spotting that both versions share the same issue. We'd just need a single one that is fixed up ;-).
