@Ed On 12/06/2020 00:16, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Ed Avis <ed.avis@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> The git-log manual page says >> >> --name-only >> Show only names of changed files. >> >> But when a file has been renamed, only the new name is printed, not the >> old. I think it would be more useful and more correct to print both >> names. Was this a concern that the manual did not clarify which name (old or new) was being reported? Philip > It is just you who thinks it would be more useful. > > Scripts written by people over the last 10 years that expect to see > new name would certainly hate to see two names start appearing > there. > > Perhaps you can use --summary at the same time?
