Ed Avis <ed.avis@xxxxxxxx> writes: > The git-log manual page says > > --name-only > Show only names of changed files. > > But when a file has been renamed, only the new name is printed, not the > old. I think it would be more useful and more correct to print both > names. It is just you who thinks it would be more useful. Scripts written by people over the last 10 years that expect to see new name would certainly hate to see two names start appearing there. Perhaps you can use --summary at the same time?
