Matt Rogers <mattr94@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> - * We also leave "master" as a special case, since it does not reveal >> - * anything interesting. >> + * We also leave the default branch name as a special case, since it >> + * does not reveal anything interesting. >> */ > I feel this is a weird thing to do, since you're trying to anonymize the branch > name,and now the default branch is identifiable with your config file. For > example, if the default branch contains the name of my project/repo then this > sounds like a recipe for accidentally sharing it. I feel a better > alternative would > be to exclude nothing from the anonymization or the proposed default default > branch name I wonder if anything bad happens if we keep *no* refs intact in this function. "Since it does not reveal anything interesting" is an excuse why not munging it may be OK, but it does not explain why we prefer not munging it actively. If there is no reason to keep _some_ refs as-is, I agree that it is perfectly sensible not to have this special case at all. Thanks. >> - if (!strcmp(refname, "refs/heads/master")) >> + if (!default_branch_name) >> + default_branch_name = git_default_branch_name(0); >> + >> + if (!strcmp(refname, default_branch_name)) >> return refname; >> >> strbuf_reset(&anon); >> -- >> gitgitgadget >>
