Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > One thing I think we _could_ do is to switch v2 to only reading the > config once, instead of once per request. And then all of those config > values could remain where they are, as they wouldn't need to be cleared > or reset. But I doubt the cost of parsing config per-request is > noticeable in practice, so I'm happy with it either way. Yeah, I agree that that would not be an optimization for performance, but the value of doing it primarily lies in gaining the conceptual clarity in the resulting code. Thanks, both.
