Hi, On Fri, 15 May 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> > >> At this late stage in the cycle, would it be a safer change to > >> revert the whole thing, I wonder, rather than piling fixes on top of > >> fixes to the initial breakage? > >> > >> 303775a2 (t/test_lib: avoid naked bash arrays in file_lineno, 2020-05-07) > >> 662f9cf1 (tests: when run in Bash, annotate test failures with file name/line number, 2020-04-11) > > > > will also need: > > > > 676eb0c1ce (ci: add a problem matcher for GitHub Actions, 2020-04-11) > > Yeah, I think that is a good idea. I suspect that leaving it there > won't cause problems, though---it would be just nothing is found to > be clicked and that's the end of it, no? > > Will add a revert to the series anyway. Yes, I'm fine with reverting this, as breaking TAP is a rather bad side effect. Ciao, Dscho
