Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belón <carenas@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:50:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> At this late stage in the cycle, would it be a safer change to >> revert the whole thing, I wonder, rather than piling fixes on top of >> fixes to the initial breakage? >> >> 303775a2 (t/test_lib: avoid naked bash arrays in file_lineno, 2020-05-07) >> 662f9cf1 (tests: when run in Bash, annotate test failures with file name/line number, 2020-04-11) > > will also need: > > 676eb0c1ce (ci: add a problem matcher for GitHub Actions, 2020-04-11) Yeah, I think that is a good idea. I suspect that leaving it there won't cause problems, though---it would be just nothing is found to be clicked and that's the end of it, no? Will add a revert to the series anyway. Thanks.
