Le 11.05.2020 à 00:42, Eric Sunshine a écrit :
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:53 PM Guillaume Galeazzi
<guillaume.galeazzi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, maybe renaming the flag to `--is-active` would make it a tad bit
simpler?
is-active sound more like a question to me but I can change it.
I'm not a submodule user nor have I been following this discussion,
but perhaps the name --active-only would be better?
To flow up on that topic, the flag can be `--[no-]active`. It simplify
code and allow the optional negation. On the source, the variable will
be renamed active_only.
