On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 5:53 PM Guillaume Galeazzi <guillaume.galeazzi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, maybe renaming the flag to `--is-active` would make it a tad bit > > simpler? > is-active sound more like a question to me but I can change it. I'm not a submodule user nor have I been following this discussion, but perhaps the name --active-only would be better?
