> Imagine a user wanted to spawn a graphical editor via git-jump from within > a GUI script (probably launched from a window manager menu and has no > gqipterminal). With git-jump with this patch, such a use will be broken, no? Aha OK that's an example that I didn't grok from your earlier mails, I had only been thinking in the context of editors. The reasoning behind the "escape hatch" you describe makes sense. > Unilaterally breaking, and ignoring when you are told you are > breaking, possible existing users, without giving them any escape > hatch, is simply irresponsible, and not something done in this > project. But I am sensing that you are not listening to and > thinking about what you hear before you respond, so I will stop > spending time on this topic for now, and wait until others chime in. I apologise for not understanding, it was not my intention to be willfully ignorant.
