Re: [PATCH 6/8] t9164: don't use `test_must_fail test_cmp`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hannes suggested that we should drop the tip commit of this series[1]
> and I tend to agree with him. Aside from that, though, the series is
> ready to go.
>
> (I could improve 3/8 as suggested here[2] but I'll throw it in the next
> series instead since I'm trying to get into the habit of not adding in
> unrelated patches.)
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/6cfa2c447e1196d6c4325aff9fac52434d10fda8.1587372771.git.liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx/
> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/90faeb7a-1c6a-3fc6-6410-5e264c9340e8@xxxxxxxx/

I agree with you two that test_must_fail may make sense with these
__git_foo helpers used in the completion.  It is a bit of shame that
there is no opportunity to leave the reasoning behind the decision
for later developers, other than in the discussion thread.

I agree that 3/8 is good as-is in this series.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux