Re: [PATCH 6/8] t9164: don't use `test_must_fail test_cmp`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:09:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:55 AM Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The test_must_fail function should only be used for git commands since
> >> we assume that external commands work sanely. Since test_cmp() just
> >> wraps an external command, replace `test_must_fail test_cmp` with
> >> `! test_cmp`.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Denton Liu <liu.denton@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/t/t9164-git-svn-dcommit-concurrent.sh b/t/t9164-git-svn-dcommit-concurrent.sh
> >> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ test_expect_success 'check if pre-commit hook fails' '
> >> -               test_must_fail svn_cmd commit -m "this commit should fail" &&
> >> +               ! svn_cmd commit -m "this commit should fail" &&
> >
> > Hmm, this doesn't look like 'test_cmp' mentioned in the commit message.
> 
> Yeah, the other hunk is about test_cmp and this hunk is about
> svn_cmd.  The stated rationale applies to both wrappers, I think.
> 
>     Subject: [PATCH 6/8] t9164: use test_must_fail only on git
> 
>     The `test_must_fail` function should only be used for git commands;
>     we are not in the business of catching segmentation fault by external
>     commands.  Shell helper functions test_cmp and svn_cmd used in this
>     script are wrappers around external commands, so just use `! cmd`
>     instead of `test_must_fail cmd`
> 
> perhaps, without any change to the code?

Thanks, this looks good to me too.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux