>From Junio C Hamano, Thu 26 Mar 2020 at 16:27:16 (-0700) : > I think this is underflow & wraparound, but I'll let it pass ;-) Ah thanks for the 'wraparound' term, I was missing it, so that's why I wrote overflow instead since everybody understand what I meant. Mathematically I think of this as a truncating in the ring of 2-adic integers, but I did not want to write this in the commit message :) > The patch looks good; will queue. Thanks. I just sent a v5 with a microfix (which is not really important, so v5 can be dropped). Since pu is subject to be rewound anyway, I guess you prefer a new version rather than a patch on top of v4? -- Damien Robert http://www.normalesup.org/~robert/pro
