Hi Junio, On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > With this explanation, I totally agree that your patch is better than > > mine. > > Meaning that we'd have a fallback checker that understands "diff -u" > output, because the presense of "diff -u" cannot be relied upon and > we'd need to keep the original that understands "diff -c" anyway? > > If that is what you meant, I am 100% fine with that. Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for clearing this up! Ciao, Dscho
