Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > With this explanation, I totally agree that your patch is better than > mine. Meaning that we'd have a fallback checker that understands "diff -u" output, because the presense of "diff -u" cannot be relied upon and we'd need to keep the original that understands "diff -c" anyway? If that is what you meant, I am 100% fine with that.
