On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 08:03:01PM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote: > On 3/21/2020 2:50 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Do we need to worry about INFO_QUICK and SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT in this > > codepath, by the way? > > I was coming back to this thread to bring up these exact flags for > consideration. The good news is that in a partial clone with any > amount of filtering we will still have all reachable commits, which > are necessary for the commit-graph to make sense. The only ones that > would fail has_object_file() are ones removed by GC, but they may > still exist on the remote. So without SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT, we would > generate a network call even if the server has GC'd to remove the > commits. This gets particularly bad when the server returns all > reachable objects from that commit! That makes sense. Do you think something like this should be applied? diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c index c7cfadc786..0097318798 100644 --- a/commit-graph.c +++ b/commit-graph.c @@ -1594,6 +1594,7 @@ static void merge_commit_graph(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx, { uint32_t i; uint32_t offset = g->num_commits_in_base; + int flags = OBJECT_INFO_QUICK | OBJECT_INFO_SKIP_FETCH_OBJECT; ALLOC_GROW(ctx->commits.list, ctx->commits.nr + g->num_commits, ctx->commits.alloc); @@ -1606,7 +1607,7 @@ static void merge_commit_graph(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx, load_oid_from_graph(g, i + offset, &oid); /* only add commits if they still exist in the repo */ - if (repo_has_object_file(ctx->r, &oid)) { + if (repo_has_object_file_with_flags(ctx->r, &oid, flags)) { result = lookup_commit(ctx->r, &oid); if (repo_parse_commit(ctx->r, result)) result = NULL; > Thanks, > -Stolee Thanks, Taylor