Hi Jacob, On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Jacob Keller wrote: > Sorry this is on phone and might not hit the list since Gmail forces > html.... but the docs say git-rebase when you meant git-stash. > > I didn't want to forget this before I got to a desktop Good point. You mean this part, right? > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020, 10:20 AM Thomas Gummerer <t.gummerer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > diff --git a/Documentation/config/stash.txt > > b/Documentation/config/stash.txt > > index abc7ef4a3a..0f3db821f6 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/config/stash.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/config/stash.txt > > @@ -1,17 +1,9 @@ > > stash.useBuiltin:: > > - Set to `false` to use the legacy shell script implementation of > > - linkgit:git-stash[1]. Is `true` by default, which means use > > - the built-in rewrite of it in C. > > -+ > > -The C rewrite is first included with Git version 2.22 (and Git for Windows > > -version 2.19). This option serves as an escape hatch to re-enable the > > -legacy version in case any bugs are found in the rewrite. This option and > > -the shell script version of linkgit:git-stash[1] will be removed in some > > -future release. > > -+ > > -If you find some reason to set this option to `false`, other than > > -one-off testing, you should report the behavior difference as a bug in > > -Git (see https://git-scm.com/community for details). > > + Unused configuration Variable. Used in Git versions 2.22 to > > + 2.26 as an escape hatch to enable the legacy shellscript > > + implementation of rebase. Now the built-in rewrite of it in C ^^^^^^ If so, I agree, that should be s/rebase/stash/. Thanks for paying apparently more attention than I did! Dscho > > + is always used. Setting this will emit a warning, to alert any > > + remaining users that setting this now does nothing. > > > > stash.showPatch:: > > If this is set to true, the `git stash show` command without an