Re: [PATCH 3/3] t: drop debug `cat` calls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Martin Ågren <martin.agren@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For the first patch 1/3, if we lose the cat entirely, we risk bugs in
> *git* being hidden.

Yes, as Peff already said, the change to explicitly test if the file
exists makes perfect sense.

> For the hunk in patch 2/3, I first thought it was in the same
> category, before I realized that kwdelfile.c disappearing would be
> a bug in *p4* as opposed to *git p4*.  Since we're not in the
> business of testing/verifying other people's software, we can
> afford to drop that call entirely.

It is ">kwdelfile.c" shell redirection that creates that file.  I
agree with you that preparing for a bug that "p4 add -t ktext
kwdelfile.c" or "p4 submit" removes the file is a little too much.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux