"Garima Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> From: Garima Singh <garima.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 04/11] commit-graph: compute Bloom filters for changed paths
>
> Compute Bloom filters for the paths that changed between a commit and its
> first parent using the implementation in bloom.c, when the
> COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHANGED_PATHS flag is set. This computation is done on a
> commit-by-commit basis. We will write these Bloom filters to the commit graph
> file in the next change.
I have no major complaints about the contents of this patch (except lack
of test, and type of total_bloom_filter_data_size), but the commit
message could have been worded better.
I would write something like this instead:
Add new COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHANGED_PATHS flag that makes Git compute
Bloom filters that store the information about changed paths (that
changed between a commit and its first parent) for each commit in the
commit-graph. This computation is done on a commit-by-commit basis.
We will write these Bloom filters to the commit-graph file, to store
this data on disk, in the next change in this series.
In my opinion the fact that we compute Bloom filters for each and every
commit in the commit-graph file is more important than quite obvious
fact that we use implementation from bloom.c.
>
> Helped-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Garima Singh <garima.singh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> commit-graph.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> commit-graph.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
It would be good to have at least sanity check of this feature, perhaps
one that would check that the number of per-commit Bloom filters on slab
matches the number of commits in the commit-graph.
It could look something like this:
test_expect_success 'create Bloom filters for all commit-graph commits' '
# create commit-graph with 2 commits
git rev-parse HEAD HEAD^ | git commit-graph write --stdin-commits &&
# generate Bloom filters for commit-graph commits
cat >commands <<\-EOF &&
add-graph-commits
filters-count
EOF
NUM_FILTERS=$(git test-tool bloom <commands) %%
test "$NUM_FILTERS" -eq 2
'
>
> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
> index 3c4d411326..724bfcffc4 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include "hashmap.h"
> #include "replace-object.h"
> #include "progress.h"
> +#include "bloom.h"
>
> #define GRAPH_SIGNATURE 0x43475048 /* "CGPH" */
> #define GRAPH_CHUNKID_OIDFANOUT 0x4f494446 /* "OIDF" */
> @@ -795,9 +796,11 @@ struct write_commit_graph_context {
> unsigned append:1,
> report_progress:1,
> split:1,
> - check_oids:1;
> + check_oids:1,
> + changed_paths:1;
All right, this flag will be used for handling future `--changed-paths`
option to the `git commit-graph write`.
>
> const struct split_commit_graph_opts *split_opts;
> + uint32_t total_bloom_filter_data_size;
This is total size of Bloom filters data, in bytes, that will later be
used for BDAT chunk size. However the commit-graph format uses 8 bytes
for byte-offset, not 4 bytes. Why it is uint32_t and not uint64_t then?
> };
>
> static void write_graph_chunk_fanout(struct hashfile *f,
> @@ -1140,6 +1143,28 @@ static void compute_generation_numbers(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
> stop_progress(&ctx->progress);
> }
>
> +static void compute_bloom_filters(struct write_commit_graph_context *ctx)
> +{
> + int i;
> + struct progress *progress = NULL;
> +
> + load_bloom_filters();
> +
> + if (ctx->report_progress)
> + progress = start_progress(
> + _("Computing commit diff Bloom filters"),
> + ctx->commits.nr);
> +
Shouldn't we initialize ctx->total_bloom_filter_data_size to 0 here? We
cannot use compute_bloom_filters() to _update_ Bloom filters data, I
think -- we don't distinguish here between new and existing data (where
existing data size is already included in total Bloom filters size). At
least I don't think so.
> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->commits.nr; i++) {
> + struct commit *c = ctx->commits.list[i];
Here we process commit in whatever order commits are in the
commits.list, which probably means lexicographical order, in practice
random order.
> + struct bloom_filter *filter = get_bloom_filter(ctx->r, c);
> + ctx->total_bloom_filter_data_size += sizeof(uint64_t) * filter->len;
> + display_progress(progress, i + 1);
> + }
> +
> + stop_progress(&progress);
> +}
> +
> static int add_ref_to_list(const char *refname,
> const struct object_id *oid,
> int flags, void *cb_data)
> @@ -1794,6 +1819,8 @@ int write_commit_graph(const char *obj_dir,
> ctx->split = flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT ? 1 : 0;
> ctx->check_oids = flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS ? 1 : 0;
> ctx->split_opts = split_opts;
> + ctx->changed_paths = flags & COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_BLOOM_FILTERS ? 1 : 0;
> + ctx->total_bloom_filter_data_size = 0;
>
> if (ctx->split) {
> struct commit_graph *g;
> @@ -1888,6 +1915,9 @@ int write_commit_graph(const char *obj_dir,
>
> compute_generation_numbers(ctx);
>
> + if (ctx->changed_paths)
> + compute_bloom_filters(ctx);
> +
All right.
> res = write_commit_graph_file(ctx);
>
> if (ctx->split)
> diff --git a/commit-graph.h b/commit-graph.h
> index 7f5c933fa2..952a4b83be 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.h
> +++ b/commit-graph.h
> @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ enum commit_graph_write_flags {
> COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_PROGRESS = (1 << 1),
> COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_SPLIT = (1 << 2),
> /* Make sure that each OID in the input is a valid commit OID. */
> - COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS = (1 << 3)
> + COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_CHECK_OIDS = (1 << 3),
> + COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_BLOOM_FILTERS = (1 << 4)
All right.
Side note: perhaps we could add trailing comma after new enum entry,
that is
+ COMMIT_GRAPH_WRITE_BLOOM_FILTERS = (1 << 4),
following new CodingGuidelines recommendation
- We try to support a wide range of C compilers to compile Git with,
including old ones. You should not use features from newer C
standard, even if your compiler groks them.
There are a few exceptions to this guideline:
. since early 2012 with e1327023ea, we have been using an enum
definition whose last element is followed by a comma. This, like
an array initializer that ends with a trailing comma, can be used
to reduce the patch noise when adding a new identifier at the end.
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/CodingGuidelines#L197
> };
>
> struct split_commit_graph_opts {
