Jacques Bodin-Hullin <j.bodinhullin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Signed-off-by: Jacques Bodin-Hullin <j.bodinhullin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> parse-options.c | 4 ++--
> t/t0040-parse-options.sh | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/parse-options.c b/parse-options.c
> index b42f54d48b96c..71dbe84d896b4 100644
> --- a/parse-options.c
> +++ b/parse-options.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ static void check_typos(const char *arg, const struct option *options)
> return;
>
> if (starts_with(arg, "no-")) {
> - error(_("did you mean `--%s` (with two dashes ?)"), arg);
> + error(_("did you mean `--%s` (with two dashes)?"), arg);
Makes sense. Not just there is an extra SP before the question
mark, the question mark is about the whole sentence, so pushing
it out of the parentheses also is a good change.
We might even want to lose the parentheses altogether, i.e.
did you mean `--%s` with two dashes?
Hmm?
Thanks.
