Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] SHA-256 test fixes, part 8

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2020-01-26 at 10:25:31, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi brian,
> 
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2020, brian m. carlson wrote:
> 
> > This is the second-to-last series of test fixes for SHA-256.
> >
> > As mentioned previously, the patch for t3305 seems to indicate a bug in
> > the notes code and I'm not familiar enough with that code to apply a
> > fix.  This is a band-aid to get it working with SHA-256, but any
> > comments on a more robust approach would of course be welcome.
> >
> > Changes from v1:
> > * Drop patch for t3404 in favor of Dscho's fix.
> > * Drop patch for t5616 in favor of Jonathan Tan's fix.
> > * Add missing sign-off.
> > * Move test_oid_init into the correct patch.
> 
> Would you terribly mind pushing up your local branch to a public place? I
> used the apply-from-public-inbox.sh script I maintain at
> https://github.com/git-for-windows/build-extra to apply your patch series
> on top of v2.25.0, but I got this:
> 
> 	Applying: t5607: make hash size independent
> 	Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> 	M       t/t5607-clone-bundle.sh
> 	Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> 	No changes -- Patch already applied.
> 
> (I want to have a look at the notes fanout. Will keep you posted on my
> investigation there.)

The branch is test-fixes-part8 on https://github.com/bk2204/git.git.
It's currently based off master.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux