On 2020-01-17 at 17:49:31, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 09:37:22AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Recent versions of the gcc and clang Address Sanitizer produce test > > > failures related to regexec(). This triggers with gcc-10 and clang-8 > > > (but not gcc-9 nor clang-7). Running: > > > > > > make CC=gcc-10 SANITIZE=address test > > > > > > results in failures in t4018, t3206, and t4062. > > [...] > > I guess we should treat this the same way as the recent vcproj "fix" > > by Dscho, i.e. fast-track to 'maint' to ensure that all public > > integration branches has it soonish? > > I don't think there's a huge rush. It only triggers ASan and recent > compilers, so AFAIK nobody has been hitting this in CI. I occasionally > test with whatever is the most recent compiler in Debian unstable to see > if it turns up any interesting new warnings or errors (but gcc-9 is > still the default there). I've reported this as a bug to Debian on the clang-8 and libasan6 packages, along with a trivial test case. Hopefully this will get fixed soon. -- brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature