Hi Junio, On Tue, 17 Dec 2019, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > As I said elsewhere, if Git for Windows' FSCache hack is the only thing > > that is broken by this patch series, in light of the bugs that it _does_ > > fix I would rather adjust the FSCache patches to accommodate v2. > > With "FSCache hack", do you refer to the "d_name is a pointer to > elsewhere" thing? Yes. > If so, I too very much appreciate the direction you are suggesting. > Seeing that these three patches essentially are the same as three (1/8, > 3/8 and 4/8) from the v2, I'd keep all the 8 patches from v2 in my tree > for now. > > Thanks, both. Thank you, Dscho
