Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > As I said elsewhere, if Git for Windows' FSCache hack is the only thing > that is broken by this patch series, in light of the bugs that it _does_ > fix I would rather adjust the FSCache patches to accommodate v2. With "FSCache hack", do you refer to the "d_name is a pointer to elsewhere" thing? If so, I too very much appreciate the direction you are suggesting. Seeing that these three patches essentially are the same as three (1/8, 3/8 and 4/8) from the v2, I'd keep all the 8 patches from v2 in my tree for now. Thanks, both.
