Johannes Schindelin wrote:
So this leaves me with the question: do Windows users really want a proper native Windows support for Git? If the answer is yes, why don't they _do_ (as in "not talk") something about it?
I'm not a Windows user, but I know some, so I can maybe answer this: They do want that, but what they primarily want is a good DVCS they can use without trouble. I know at least two Windows people who took a look at the Win32 git, had trouble with it, then looked at Mercurial (which, whatever opinions you might have about it, does work better on Windows) and just stuck with that since it met their needs.
The fact that Mercurial exists is a big disincentive for Windows people to work on git; unless they specifically want to interoperate with an existing git repository, hg gives them a lot of the same features that we enjoy in git land. And they don't have to fiddle with MinGW or Cygwin or anything like that. The distance between git and hg is small enough in their minds that it's not worth the unknown amount of effort to work on making git run better.
At least, that's my take on it. Maybe an actual Windows git user will tell me I'm full of it...
-Steve - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
