Re: GitGitGadget on git/git, was Re: Should we auto-close PRs on git/git?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, Jeff King wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 07:37:57PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> >
> > > To build some confidence in my patches (as you probably know, I do
> > > not trust reviews as much as I trust real-life testing, although I
> > > do prefer to have both) I "kind of" activated it on my fork, limited
> > > to act only on comments _I_ made on PRs (and sending only to me
> > > instead of the list), and it seems to work all right, so far. I
> > > cannot say for sure whether it handles the PR labels correctly, but
> > > I guess time will tell, and I will fix bugs as quickly as I can.
> >
> > Yeah, that makes sense to me. Going from one repo to three is not much
> > worse than going to two, so it's good to have a testing area, too.
> >
> > Do you want any third-party testing there (e.g., a user who isn't you
> > making a PR against dscho/git)?
>
> While that would be nice, my fork is a mess and not really set up to
> provide any useful target branch...
>
> The real proof of the concept will come when the first git/git PR will
> be submitted.

Seems to have worked:
https://public-inbox.org/git/pull.670.git.git.1574433665.gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx/

Ciao,
Dscho




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux