Re: Should we auto-close PRs on git/git?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 08:11:06PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > To that end, I wonder if we should add an Action to automatically
> > close PRs on that repo. It looks like
> > https://github.com/dessant/repo-lockdown would do the trick. We could
> > close incoming PRs automatically with a kind, maybe more succinct or
> > prescriptive version of the prefill text encouraging folks to open the
> > exact same PR against gitgitgadget/git instead.
> 
> I am rather certain that that would not be a good thing to do.
> 
> There are some people who open git/git PRs solely for the PR builds,
> others to facilitate code review, and yet others just because it is the
> intuitively obvious way to contribute to Git.

We talked a while ago about having GitGitGadget operate on git/git,
rather than on a separate mirror. That would automatically help at least
one class of PR-opener: people who want their patches to reach the list
but didn't realize they should be using gitgitgadget/git.

I don't remember what the technical blockers are for getting that set
up, but it seems like a strictly nicer outcome than auto-closing their
PR.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux