On 11/20/2019 7:36 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >>> OK. I had an impression that it was something relatively easily >>> patched to restore the plumbing behaviour without taking the >>> remainder of the series with a follow-on work. If it is not the >>> case, perhaps I should revert the merge to 'next' and kick it back >>> to 'pu'. >>> >>> Thanks for stopping me. >> >> That commit can be ejected from the series without affecting the >> correctness of any of the other commits. That will require reverting >> the merge at this point, though. > > I've done the "reverting" part of everything, so that other patches > that need further work, if any, can be given a fresh start. I see that more feedback was given, so I'm working on a new version. Thanks, -Stolee
