Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> OK. I had an impression that it was something relatively easily >> patched to restore the plumbing behaviour without taking the >> remainder of the series with a follow-on work. If it is not the >> case, perhaps I should revert the merge to 'next' and kick it back >> to 'pu'. >> >> Thanks for stopping me. > > That commit can be ejected from the series without affecting the > correctness of any of the other commits. That will require reverting > the merge at this point, though. I've done the "reverting" part of everything, so that other patches that need further work, if any, can be given a fresh start. Thanks.
