Re: coccinelle: merge two rules from flex_alloc.cocci

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Does any test infrastructure (or benchmarks) exist which you would trust for
>> corresponding comparisons of software run time characteristics?
>
> Yes, just run:
>
>   make cocciclean
>   time make contrib/coccinelle/flex_alloc.cocci.patch

Thanks for this suggestion.


> before and after your changes, and include the timing results in the
> commit message if there is a notable difference.

The measurements from my test system might not be representative enough.


> FWIW, I did just that with your "coccinelle: merge twelve rules from
> object_id.cocci" patch [1], and the runtime went down from 2m48.610 to
> 2m34.395, a bit over 8% speedup. (with Ubuntu 16.04's Coccinelle
> 1.0.4)
>
>
> [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/6c9962c0-67c1-e700-c145-793ce6498099@xxxxxx/

These numbers seem to be nice.
Would a direct reply have been more helpful for the referenced patch
than the current subject?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux