On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:18 AM SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:09:20AM +0000, Utsav Shah via GitGitGadget wrote: > > The checks added in 3444ec2eb2 ("fsmonitor: don't fill bitmap with > > entries to be removed", 2019-10-11), to ensure that the > > fsmonitor_dirty bitmap does not have more bits than the index > > do not play well with the split index. > > > > git update-index --fsmonitor --split-index calls write_locked_index > > which calls write_shared_index as well as write_split_index. > > The first call fills up the fsmonitor_dirty bitmap, > > and the second modifies the index such that istate->cache_nr is zero and > > this assert is hit. > > Just to make sure that we are on the same page, is this the one? > > BUG: fsmonitor.c:88: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (102 > 1) > Yes, that's the one. > > The test written does reproduce the error, but only flakily. There is > > limited difference with GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR=fsmonitor-all or > > GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR=fsmonitor-watchman, so the flakiness might come from > > somewhere else, which I haven't tracked down. > > > > The test also requires checkout of a new branch, and checking out back > > to master. > > It doesn't; see below. > > > It's clear that the index gets into some poor state through > > these operations, and there is a deeper bug somewhere. > > > > At the very least, this patch mitigates an over-eager check for split > > index users while maintaining good invariants for the standard case. > > Also, I haven't been able to reproduce this with "standard" user > > commands, like status/checkout/stash, so the blast radius seems limited. > > > > Helped-by: Kevin Willford <kewillf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Utsav Shah <utsav@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > > index d8df990972..b5029eff3e 100755 > > --- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > > +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > > @@ -371,4 +371,27 @@ test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' ' > > ) > > ' > > > > +# Git will only split indices if we have a bunch of files created, > > +# so that prep work of creating a few hundred files is required. > > 'git update-index --split-index' splits the index no matter what; it > even splits an empty index. > > > +# Note that this test doesn't fail determinstically without > > +# its corresponding bugfix. > > +test_expect_success 'update-index succeeds after staging with split index' ' > > + test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-split && > > + ( > > + cd fsmonitor-stage-split && > > + test_commit initial && > > + files=$(test_seq 1 100) && > > + echo "hello world" > file && > > + touch $files && > > + git add -A && > > + git commit -m "next" && > > + git config core.fsmonitor "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-watchman" && > > + echo "hello world" > file && > > + git checkout -b new-branch && > > + git checkout master && > > + echo hello >> file && > > + git update-index --split-index --untracked-cache --fsmonitor > > + ) > > +' > > I could reproduce the failure with '-r 30 --stress' relatively easily > [1], but with those options I could shave off a lot from this test: > > test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-split && > ( > cd fsmonitor-stage-split && > >tracked && > git add tracked && > git config core.fsmonitor > "$TEST_DIRECTORY/t7519/fsmonitor-watchman" && > >untracked && > git update-index --split-index --untracked-cache --fsmonitor > ) > > and could still trigger the failure: > > + git update-index --split-index --untracked-cache --fsmonitor > open2: exec of watchman -j failed at /home/szeder/src/git/t/t7519/fsmonitor-watchman line 47. > BUG: fsmonitor.c:88: fsmonitor_dirty has more entries than the index (1 > 0) > > > [1] There is a quite expensive lazy prereq evaluation outside of > 'test_expect_*' that I disabled it with the following for > speedier stress testing: > > diff --git a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > index 997d5fb349..103520415d 100755 > --- a/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > +++ b/t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh > @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ write_integration_script () { > } > > test_lazy_prereq UNTRACKED_CACHE ' > - { git update-index --test-untracked-cache; ret=$?; } && > - test $ret -ne 1 > + true > ' > > test_expect_success 'setup' '