"Utsav Shah via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > At the very least, this patch mitigates an over-eager check for split index > users while maintaining good invariants for the standard case. OK, it sounds more like this "it does not make any sense to compare the position in the fsmonitor bitmap (which covers the entire thing) with the position in just a split part of the index (which covers only the delta over the base index)"? If that is the case, it means that the "check" is even worse than being "over-eager"---it simply is not correct. Thanks, will queue.