Re: [PATCH] git log -g: Complain, but do not fail, when no reflogs are there

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs
> that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either.
>
> So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other refs.

Hmph, do we even want to error(), I wonder...

Can you tell, at that point, if there were explicit branch
names given originally on the command line, or the refs came
from --all?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux