Re: [PATCH v3] userdiff: add Elixir to supported userdiff languages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Please keep the Cc list when you send new patch versions. Also, it is
> customary to send them as replies to the earlier iterations, so that
> they all end up in the same thread.

Sorry, I am still learning how to use git send-email and I thought it would be handled automatically.
I need to find how to operate it properly and how to configure it to reply in thread instead of
creating new one.

> There are no single- and double-quote anymore. An oversight? Or an error
> in the earlier iteration?

No, I intentionally left them out, as :’foo bar’ is allowed atom, and I didn’t want to complicate
everything word regex. Instead I assumed that these are so rare, that it should not be a problem.

> The leading optional sign may be problematic. When a patch changes "i+1"
> to "i+2", it would be highlighted as "i{-+1-}{++2+}" instead of as
> "i+{-1-}{+2+}". You could remove the leading optional sign and let it be
> processed as an operator. But we also have an optional sign in the cpp
> pattern as well, and haven't noticed it until now, so…

I copied this pattern from other languages, so I assumed that this is what is expected.
It could be fixed, but I think it should be handled in separate patch.

--

Łukasz Niemier
lukasz@xxxxxxxxxx









[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux