> From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> > > In a following commit we will need to allocate a variable > number of bitmap words, instead of always 32, so let's add > bitmap_word_alloc() for this purpose. > > We will also always access at least one word for each bitmap, > so we want to make sure that at least one is always > allocated. The last paragraph is not true - we still can allocate 0. (We just ensure that when we grow, we grow to at least 1.) I think we should just delete the last paragraph - the first paragraph is sufficient. Other than that, all patches up to but not including the last one look good, except the ones that just add a new function because I'll have to review the last patch to see how they are used.
