Re: [PATCH 3/3] mingw: bump the minimum Windows version to Vista

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 14 Oct 2019, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >
> > >> It also means that we no longer need the inet_pton() and inet_ntop()
> > >> emulation, which is nice.
> > >
> > > Earlier in this series you add a:
> > >
> > > #if defined(_WIN32_WINNT) && _WIN32_WINNT >= 0x600
> > > ...
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > Shouldn't that now be something like:
> > >
> > > #if defined(_WIN32_WINNT)
> > > #if _WIN32_WINNT >= 0x600
> > > ...
> > > #else
> > > #error "You need at least Windows Vista to build Git!"
> > > #endif
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > Or do we catch users building on non-supported versions earlier somehow
> > > (i.e. not just with a flood of compilation errors).
> >
> > That sounds like a reasonable thing to be curious about.
>
> I specifically wanted to leave the door open for people who might want
> to put in the effort of keeping Windows XP support alive.
>
> But I guess this does not make any sense anymore, what with Windows
> _Vista_ being at its end of its life in 3 months.
>
> Thanks! Will prepare a patch,

Actually, while preparing that patch, I noticed that this is in the
`compat/poll/` part of our source code. I'd rather not inflict the
Vista-or-later requirement on that part, as it is relatively
self-contained and could still be copied into software that does support
Windows XP.

Thanks,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux