Hi, On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > But in general I do not see ("I haven't realized" might turn out to be a > better expression) much value in this series yet except for the initial > clean-up patches, while I think this option would be quite expensive in > terms of memory footprints on projects with nontrivial size of history. > I dunno. It would not, since you do not have to say "--decorate" at all. However, if you do want the functionality this patch provides, you have to jump through hoops right now. ATM an alias is my work around, since I run 'master' as you requested: git config --global alias.decoratelog '!sh -c "(case \"\$0\" in sh) git log --color;; *) git log --color \"\$0\" \"\$@\";; esac) | git -p name-rev --tags --stdin"' Ugly, ain't it? And I still have to look up at which release certain features were introduced every day. Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html