On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 02:29:49AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > The option --decorate changed default behavior: Earlier, it decorated > commits pointed to by any ref. The new behavior is this: decorate the > with the given refs and its ancestors, i.e. > > git log --decorate next master > > will show "next", "next^", "next~2", ..., "master", "master^", ... > in parenthesis after the commit name. I'm wondering how useful the default is. The arguments get used for two things; both for git-log to decide what revisions to display, and which refs to decorate, right? I'm not sure that overloading is such a great idea. Also, I note that "git log --decorate" does nothing at all. Maybe it would be better to keep the default to be "any-ref" instead of "given"? - Ted - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
