Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] builtin/rebase.c: make sure the active branch isn't moved when autostashing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben <ben@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> As long as you make it clear that you are 100% happy with the
>> fixed-up result that appeared in 'pu', there is no need to resend
>> (if you want to make any other changes, I do want to avoid me
>> screwing up by listening to you and hand applying those changes; I'd
>> rather want updated patch(es) be sent in such a case).
>> 
>
> Hi Junio,
>
> I am 100% happy with with your fixed-up result.
> I have no (planned) updates ATM.
>
>
> Thank you all for the thorough reviews.

Thanks. 

I meant to say "(and it is pretty clear already in this case)" after
the "... appeared in 'pu'," but forgot to do so; sorry for making
you send an extra round of response.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux