Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] builtin/rebase.c: make sure the active branch isn't moved when autostashing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 01-09-2019 18:01, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ben <ben@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>>
>> Would you like me to send in another patch or leave it like this?
> 
> As long as you make it clear that you are 100% happy with the
> fixed-up result that appeared in 'pu', there is no need to resend
> (if you want to make any other changes, I do want to avoid me
> screwing up by listening to you and hand applying those changes; I'd
> rather want updated patch(es) be sent in such a case).
> 

Hi Junio,

I am 100% happy with with your fixed-up result.
I have no (planned) updates ATM.


Thank you all for the thorough reviews.

Ben...

> Thanks.
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux