Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > ... My patch has a few > more details such as blame information (and how the typo was only made > in the explicit version, not the variadic form), so it may be worthwhile > to take that instead of this, but I don't mind either way. Yup, that was exactly why I took that version (after tentatively queuing the other one, but discarded before pushing the integration result out). Thanks, all. >> I don't know if we want to try to spread credit around via trailers. >> "Racily-implemented-by:" ? :) Please don't X-<.
