Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
I do not think Eric is right here. You will allways lose information when converting CVS to svn, and if it is just the uncertainty, the non-atomicity. This is also information (hidden one, though).
Full ACK.
Yes. I've already done what people want, it is not called cvs2xxx, but fromcvs [1]. I don't think it is necessary to define an output format. Of course, that's possible, but limiting yourself to a file format means you're losing flexibility, which is needed for efficient, correct and fast repository conversion.
Hm.. interesting. I'll have a close look. Regards Markus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
